Commercial Setting, Community Setting, Health Care Setting, Media, Migrant/Transient Site, Outreach, Private Site, Prisons, Public Site, Rural Site, Urban Site, Workplace, Schools, Faith-Based Setting, Home, Province/District

Proportion of males circumcised

Percentage of men 15-49 that are circumcised

ID: 
1043
What it measures: 

It measures progress towards increased coverage of male circumcision.

There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well-trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe and can reduce the risk of HIV acquisition. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence.

Numerator: 

Number of male respondents aged 15-49 years who report that they are
circumcised.

Denominator: 

Number of all male respondents aged 15–49 years

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Population-based surveys (Demographic and Health Survey, AIDS Indicator Survey, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys or other representative survey) Disaggregation: • Age 15-19, 20-24 and 25-49 years • Source/practitioner of circumcision procedure: formal healthcare system or traditional
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Population-based survey
Data Collection Tools: 
AIDS Indicator Survey (AIS)
Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)
Measurement Frequency: 
Every 3-5 years
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Indicator Type: 
Behavioral Outcome
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Age-group: 
15 years - 19 years
20 years - 24 years
25 years - 49 years
Strengths and weaknesses: 

Changing rates of male circumcision may or may not be the result of a programme. For example, changing societal norms not due to a programme may be leading to changing rates of male circumcision. This indicator measures total change in the population, whatever the reason(s).

Existing population-based surveys (such as DHS) may not accurately measure true male circumcision status because of a lack of knowledge of what male circumcision is, confusion about circumcision status, or perceived social desirability of circumcision status. Other approaches to determining circumcision status might be used, e.g. the use of pictures or drawings (drawings may be more culturally appropriate), prompts or even direct examination. Modelling the potential impact of changing rates of male circumcision on HIV incidence requires accurate knowledge of male circumcision status over time.

Further Information
For further information on Male Circumcision indicators, see A guide to indicators for male circumcision programmes in the formal health care system, WHO, UNAIDS, 2009 http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598262_eng.pdf

Agency: 
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
Relevance: 
Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting (GARPR) 2013
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Prevention
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Target Population: 
Age: Adults
Age: Young People
Sex: Men Only
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health-care facilities providing ART services for people living with HIV with demonstrable infection control practices that include TB control

Number of health-care facilities providing ART services for people living with HIV with demonstrable infection control practices that include TB control

ID: 
919
What it measures: 

This indicator measures if health facilities receiving a large number of people living with HIV have implemented measures to prevent the risk of person to person transmission of TB.

TB infection control is part of the "3 I's" strategy in controlling the TB/HIV epidemics (together with intensified TB case finding and isoniazide preventive therapy).

Numerator: 

Number of health care facilities providing ART services for people living with HIV with demonstrable TB infection control practices consistent with international guidelines

Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
Methodology: Facility level review of written Infection Control for TB (IC) policy with yes/no to the following questions: - is there a written infection control plan? - is there a person responsible for implementing TB infection control plan? - is the waiting area well ventilated (e.g. windows and doors open)? - are TB suspects identified on arrival at the facility and separated from other patients? - are TB cases reported among health care workers routinely monitored and reported? A positive response to all questions is required for a facility to be identified as having a TB infection control policy that is consistent with international guidelines. A positive answer to the question asking for a written infection control plan requires that a hard copy of the plan be available. Documentation for other components should also be sought. Periodicity: collected annually from each facility at the time of supervisory visits and/or external review of TB/HIV activities or HIV programmes review. Measurement tools: facility review checklist Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool: Supervision visits and health facility surveys
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Health facility checklist
Measurement Frequency: 
Annual
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

The existence of a written infection control policy that addresses TB and is consistent with international guidelines is the first basic step in ensuring TB infection control in health-care facilities providing (ART) services for people living with HIV. However, the existence of a policy does not mean that it is effectively implemented. Further inquiry will be needed to establish whether the infection control policy is implemented and adhered to. Analysis of policy involves subjective judgment, which can limit its use in cross-national comparisons and for capturing trends over time.
This indicator goes a step beyond measuring the simple existence of an infection control policy by defining the standards that must be met in order for there to be an acceptable practice that addresses the issue of control of TB infection in health-care facilities providing (ART) services for people living with HIV according to international guidelines, thus eliminating some, though not all, subjective judgment.

Additional considerations: Responsibility: HIV programmes

Data utilization: 100% target; all health facilities that offer antiretroviral therapy should have implemented TB infection control to prevent the transmission of TB from person to person

Other References: Guide to monitoring and evaluation for collaborative TB/HIV activities available at:
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598194_eng.pdf

Agency: 
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Tuberculosis (TB)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Patients: TB (tuberculosis)
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health facilities that offer antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Number of health facilities that offer antiretroviral therapy (ART)

ID: 
918
What it measures: 

Number of health facilities that offer ART (i.e., prescribe and/or provide clinical follow-up).
Capacity of health facilities to provide antiretroviral therapy (ART), expressed as percentage of health facilities that offer ART (i.e., prescribe and/or provide clinical follow-up). Health facilities include public and private facilities, health centres and clinics (including TB centres), as well as health facilities that are run by faith-based or
nongovernmental organizations.

Antiretroviral therapy is a cornerstone of effective HIV treatment, and measuring the percentage of health facilities that offer ART provides valuable information about ART availability.

Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
The numerator is calculated by summing of the number of facilities reporting availability of ART services. Information on the availability of specific services is usually kept at the national or sub-national level. National AIDS Programmes should have a record of all health facilities offering ART services. A health facility census or survey can also provide this information, along with more in-depth information on available services, provided the information is collected from a representative sample of health facilities in the country. Responses to a series of questions establish whether providers in that facility provide ART services directly (i.e., prescribe ART and/or provide clinical follow-up for ART patients) or refer patients to other health facilities for these services. In addition, facility records documenting the current status of service provision should be consulted. One potential limitation to facility surveys or censuses is that they are usually only conducted once every few years. Countries should regularly update their programme records on health facilities offering ART services, and supplement these data with those obtained through a health facility survey or census every few years. For health facility surveys or censuses, tools such as the Service Provision Assessment (SPA) or the Service Availability Mapping (SAM) can be used. Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool • Please comment on whether the data reported is from a national facility listing or census, or from a survey. If data from the private or other sectors is missing, please comment. If it is possible to easily report any additional information on the geographical distribution of facilities offering ART (e.g. urban/rural, %facilities with ART in areas with a high concentration of PLWA), please provide extra details.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Programme records
Survey: health facility
Census
Data Collection Tools: 
Service Availability Mapping (SAM)
Service Provision Assessment (SPA)
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

This indicator provides valuable information about the availability of ART services in health facilities, but it does not capture information about the quality of services provided. Antiretroviral therapy itself is complex, and it should be delivered as part of a package of care interventions, including the provision of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, the management of opportunistic infections and comorbidities, nutritional support and palliative care. Simple monitoring of ART availability does not ensure that all ART-related services are adequately provided to those who
need them. Nevertheless, it is important to know what percentage of health facilities provide ART services in order to plan for service expansion as needed to meet universal access targets.

Additional considerations
• One strategy to scale up ART services is to make ART available in more health facilities. This may be achieved by decentralizing ART services from tertiary facilities (e.g., hospitals) to primary or secondary-level health facilities. Greater availability of ART services provides crucial support to the goal of universal access to HIV treatment by 2010.
• Depending on the country's epidemic type, the denominator may not be as relevant if the HIV program strategy aims to target a limited number of sites to offer ART in.

Data utilization: To look at progress in the percentage of health facilities which provide antiretroviral therapy. Analyzing the data geographically and by type of health facilities, and triangulating the data with estimates of HIV density can provide insight into where there is a need to increase availability of ART services.

Agency: 
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Treatment
Programme Focus Specific: 
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Percentage of adults and children with HIV still alive and known to be on antiretroviral therapy 60 months after initiating treatment among patients initiating antiretroviral therapy during 2007

Percentage of adults and children with HIV still alive and known to be on antiretroviral therapy 60 months after initiating treatment among patients initiating antiretroviral therapy during 2007

ID: 
917
What it measures: 

This indicator measures the retention on ART related to the increase in survival and willingness to continue ART. It should be produced at 12 months and for longer duration of follow-up; the 24 and 60 months retention are described here (the 12 months retention is included in the GARPR indicator guidance). It completes programme coverage as a measure of the effectiveness.

Antiretroviral is a life-long intervention. Measuring retention on ART is critical for determining the effectiveness of programmes, inferring their impact and to highlight obstacles to expanding and improving them.

Numerator: 

Number of adults and children who are still alive and on ART 60 months after initiating treatment among those who initiated treatment in 2007.

Denominator: 

Total number of adults and children who initiated ART in 2007 (or another specified period), who were expected to achieve 60-month outcomes within the 2012 reporting period (or 60 months after the specified initiation period, including those who have died since starting ART, those who have stopped ART, and those recorded as lost to follow-up at month 60.

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Numerator and denominator: Programme monitoring tools; ART register; cohort analysis forms. In measuring retention, it is important to carefully select the patients according to the period they have initiated ART and to check their outcomes when they reached the expected duration of follow-up. Assessing outcomes at 24 months should include all patients started 2 years ago and at 60 months, all patients started 5 years ago. If the data available does not really fit this standard yearly period, it is important to specify the period the patients have initiated ART. Disaggregation: Among the people who started (denominator), in addition to reporting the (1) number of people alive and on treatment (numerator), it is also important to report the number (2) lost to follow-up, (3) stopped therapy, and (4) died. These 4 outcomes should sum to the number of people who started ART. When generating information at site level, patients transferred in should be included in the statistics and patients transferred out should be excluded. From the compilation of site reports, if the number of patients transferred in and transferred out is summed at the national level, these statistics should be reported for 12-month analysis. Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool: National Representativeness: If this indicator is only produced in a sub-set of facilities, comment should be added on the source of information and whether the information is representative of all ART sites.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Programme records
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Disease Impact
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

The continuation of ART is mostly related to survival (but also willingness to continue). Survival might reflect the services offered but also depends on the baseline characteristics of the patients started on ART. Clinical, immunological and virological staging are independent predictors of survival under ART. Baseline characteristics of the cohort of patients should help in interpreting the results and, in particular, comparing ART sites.

Additional considerations:
If data on 24-month or 60-month retention are not available for patients that initiated antiretroviral therapy in 2010 or 2007, respectively, but available for patients that initiated antiretroviral therapy during an earlier time period (e.g. 2009 or 2008, or 2006 or 2005), please specify the period in the comment field: e.g. "Started antiretroviral therapy between [month]/[year] and [month]/[year]”.
The numerator does not require patients to have been on antiretroviral therapy continuously for the 24 month or 60 month period. For example, patients who may have missed one or two appointments or drug pick-ups, and temporarily stopped treatment since initiating treatment but are recorded as still being on treatment at month 24 or 60 are included in the numerator. On the contrary, those patients who have died, stopped treatment or been lost to follow-up at 24 or 60 months since starting treatment are not included in the numerator.
In countries where this indicator is not produced in all ART sites but in a sub-set of facilities, data should be interpreted keeping in mind the representativeness, and this should be stated in the Comments box.

Data utilization: Note any particularly low retention and assess reasons behind it, by analysing the distribution of those who are not on ART: dead, stopped, loss to follow up. If data is available, try to assess the lost-to-follow-up population to see if they are likely to be dead, stopped, or transferred out. Compare cohorts.

Agency: 
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Treatment
Programme Focus Specific: 
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Target Population: 
Sex: All
Age: Adults
Age: Children
Age: Young People
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Percentage of health facilities that provide virological testing services (e.g. PCR) for diagnosis of HIV in infants on site or from dried blood spots (DBS)

Percentage of health facilities that provide virological testing services (e.g. PCR) for diagnosis of HIV in infants on site or from dried blood spots (DBS)

ID: 
915
What it measures: 

The extent to which countries have scaled up and increased access to early diagnosis of HIV in infants born to HIV-infected women.

Early diagnosis of HIV by on-site virological testing or through dried blood spots is critical for identifying HIV-infected infants for immediate referral to care and treatment, and to facilitate decision making by health providers

Numerator: 

Number of health facilities that provide virological testing for HIV exposed infants by on-site testing or through dried blood spots.

Denominator: 

Total number of health facilities that provide follow-up for HIV exposed infants

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
The numerator could be calculated by one of three methods, depending on the availability of information at central institutions: (a) national programme records of lists of facilities that perform virological testing on-site or through dried blood spots; (b) lists of distribution of dried blood spot kits by site, in central medical stores, private or nongovernmental organization-run medical stores responsible for national distribution or national reference laboratory; and (c) facility survey or questionnaire about whether the site is providing virological testing on site or through dried blood spots. In many countries, virological testing is performed only at a national reference laboratory or sent out of the country due to the cost of buying virological testing machines. Thus, the ‘provision’ of virological testing includes on-site testing as well as transport of dried blood spot filter papers to a virological testing laboratory. Sites that refer a mother and her infant to a site that provides virological testing on site or through dried blood spots are not included in the numerator. The denominator comprises all health facilities at any level that provide follow-up for HIV-exposed infants, including maternal and child health clinics, sites where a unit for PMTCT is responsible for the follow-up of HIV-exposed infants, nutritional centres, district hospitals and care and treatment sites. All public, private and nongovernmental organization-run health facilities that provide follow-up for HIV-exposed infants should be included. Disaggregation By availability of virological tests: On site; through DBS Uncategorized/Other category exists if you know virological tests are provided, but you are unsure whether it is done onsite or through DBS. Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool: - Double Reporting: If compiling data from multiple sources, ensure no facility is counted twice. - National Representativeness: Try to ensure information from non-governmental and private facilities are also available at the central level. If significant information is missing, note it down. - See Denominator explanation above - The total # of health facilities is used as a proxy, but if you have more accurate data on the denominator of this indicator (i.e. number of facilities where infant follow-up is possible), please report this number (or an estimate) in the Comment section.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Survey: health facility
Programme records
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

This indicator does not measure the quality of the virological testing at sites, nor the quality of the system in place, including length of turnaround time, stock-outs of DBS or virological testing reagents, and other bottlenecks in the system.

Additional considerations for countries:
In addition to monitoring the expansion of virological testing capacity at health facilities, countries may wish to periodically monitor bottlenecks in the system to expand testing capacity, including national, district level or facility level stock outs of testing materials; turnaround times for test results; human resource availability and trainings conducted; and tools available to appropriately track samples and receipt of results.

Data utilization: Look at trends overtime. Review where services are available and identify any gaps. Explore further data available on the average time it takes for test results.

Agency: 
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Target Population: 
Age: Infants
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health facilities that offer paediatric antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Number of health facilities that offer paediatric antiretroviral therapy (ART)

ID: 
914
What it measures: 

Number of health facilities that offer paediatric ART.
Capacity of health facilities to provide paediatric antiretroviral therapy (ART),expressed as percentage of health facilities that offer paediatric ART. Health facilities include public and private facilities, health centres and clinics (including TB centres), as well as health facilities that are run by faith-based or nongovernmental
organizations.

Antiretroviral therapy is a cornerstone of effective HIV treatment, and measuring the percentage of health facilities that offer paediatric ART provides valuable information about capacity to address HIV care in children.

Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
The numerator is calculated by summing of the number of facilities reporting availability of paediatric ART services. Information on the availability of specific services is usually kept at the national or sub-national level. National AIDS Programmes should have a record of all health facilities offering ART services. A health facility census or survey can also provide this information, along with more in-depth information on available services, provided the information is collected from a representative sample of health facilities in the country. Responses to a series of questions establish whether providers in that facility provide paediatric ART services directly or refer patients to other health facilities for these services. In addition, facility records documenting the current status of service provision should be consulted. One potential limitation to facility surveys or censuses is that they are usually only conducted once every few years. Countries should regularly update their programme records on health facilities offering paediatric ART services, and supplement these data with those obtained through a health facility survey or census every few years. For health facility surveys or censuses, tools such as the Service Provision Assessment (SPA) or the Service Availability Mapping (SAM) can be used. A denominator is not requested in the UA reporting tool but some countries trying to expand paediatric ART nationally can consider Total number of health facilities, excluding specialized facilities where paediatric ART services are/will never be relevant, which can be calculated by summing the total number of health facilities included in the sample. Information for construction of the denominator may come from programme records, facility listings, and/or national strategy or planning documents. It should exclude specialized facilities where paediatric ART services are/will never be relevant. (e.g. facilities specializing in eye care where ART will never be introduced) Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool: Please comment on whether the data reported is from a national facility listing or census, or from a survey. If a survey, please remember to report the year of the survey. If data from the private or other sectors is missing, please comment. If it is possible to easily report any additional information on the geographical distribution of facilities offering paediatric ART (e.g. urban/rural, %facilities with ART in areas with a high concentration of PLWA), please provide extra details.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Census
Survey: health facility
Data Collection Tools: 
Service Availability Mapping (SAM)
Service Provision Assessment (SPA)
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Sector: 
Private
Public
Strengths and weaknesses: 

This indicator provides valuable information about the availability of paediatric ART services in health facilities, but it does not capture information about the quality of services provided. Antiretroviral therapy itself is complex, and it should be delivered as part of a package of care interventions, including the provision of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, the management of opportunistic infections and comorbidities, nutritional support and palliative care. Simple monitoring of ART availability does not ensure that all ART-related services are adequately provided to those who need them.
Nevertheless, it is important to know what percentage of health facilities provide ART services in order to plan for service expansion as needed to meet universal access targets.
One potential limitation to facility surveys or censuses is that they are usually only conducted once every few years and may not capture the latest information especially in setting with recent intensified scale-up.

Additional considerations:
• One strategy to scale up ART services is to make ART including paediatric ART services available in more health facilities. This may be achieved by decentralizing ART services from tertiary facilities (e.g. hospitals) to primary or
secondary-level health facilities. Greater availability of paediatric ART services provides crucial support to the goal of universal access to HIV treatment.
Depending on the country's epidemic type, the denominator may not be as relevant if the HIV program strategy aims to target a limited number of sites to offer paediatric ART in.

Data utilization: Look at trends overtime. Explore the number of facilities that provide ART in relation the estimated number of children in need of ART.

Agency: 
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health facilities providing ANC services that also provide CD4 testing on site, or have a system for collecting and transporting blood samples for CD4 testing for HIV-infected pregnant women

Number of health facilities providing ANC services that also provide CD4 testing on site, or have a system for collecting and transporting blood samples for CD4 testing for HIV-infected pregnant women

ID: 
913
Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
Please report the number of facilities providing ANC services, which are also able to provide CD4 testing services, either: a) on site b) through a system for collecting and transporting blood samples c) Uncategorized/other Please disaggregate by categories a),b) and c). The sum of the categories should not exceed the number reported for indicator I-2a above. If the number does not represent the national number (e.g. if you only have data from public facilities, although private facilities provide a significant percentage of healthcare to your population), please comment on the representativeness of the number you are reporting.
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Agency: 
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Care & Support
Programme Focus Specific: 
Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Pregnant Women
Sex: Women Only
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health facilities providing ANC services

Number of health facilities providing ANC services

ID: 
912
Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
Please report the number of health facilities which provide ANC(antenatal care) services. If the number does not represent the national number (e.g. if you only have data from public facilities, although private facilities provide a significant percentage of healthcare to your population), please comment on the representativeness of the number you are reporting.
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Agency: 
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Prevention
Programme Focus Specific: 
Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT)
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Percentage of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

Percentage of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

ID: 
891
What it measures: 

Availability of TC services in health facilities.

Knowledge of HIV status is critical to expand access to HIV treatment, care and support, and prevention. Availability of testing and counselling (TC) services is the pre-requisite for scaling up TC coverage so that more people know their HIV status, which can be expanded through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) and provider initiated testing and counselling (PITC) models.

Numerator: 

Number of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

Denominator: 

Total number of health facilities

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Numerator: Two possible sources of information, either: 1. Central register of all T&C sites; 2. Central test kit procurement records for the number of facilities requesting kits. If both are available, then provide the information from both. Please include data on all facilities providing services in the country, whether private, public, NGO, or other. Information on availability of certain services are usually summarized at the national or sub-national level. National TC programs should have a record of facilities that provide TC services. Effort should be made to include facilities providing services in the private and NGO sectors, especially where they are a significant provider of TC services. A recent health facility census can also provide this information as well as much more in-depth information on availability of services. All sites where TC is offered should be counted. Thus sites that offer testing and refer out samples to a lab elsewhere, get test results back, and relay results to the client, are included. All sites will be included in the numerator. Disaggregation: If possible, by: 1. Type of health facility (e.g., government health facilities, NGOs, CBOs, mission hospitals, and private health facilities) 2. Type of services offered (e.g., TB clinic, STI clinic, etc) National Representativeness: Effort should be made to include all public, private and NGO-run health facilities The numerator matters in the comparison of trends in service availability over time.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Programme records
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Sector: 
Private
Public
Strengths and weaknesses: 

This indicator is intended to monitor availability of TC services as countries continue to expand TC. It does not intend to capture quality of TC services provided.

To look at progress in the number of health facilities which provide testing and counselling. Analyzing the data geographically and by type of health facilities, and triangulating it with population data, can provide insight into where there is a need to increase availability of TC services.

It is recommended that every health facility has the capacity to offer testing and counselling in generalized epidemics. In low-level and concentrated epidemics, the goal may not be to have TC services available in every facility.

Agency: 
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Document link: 
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Testing & Counseling
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

Number of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

ID: 
890
What it measures: 

Availability of TC services in health facilities.

Knowledge of HIV status is critical to expand access to HIV treatment, care and support, and prevention. Availability of testing and counselling (TC) services is the pre-requisite for scaling up TC coverage so that more people know their HIV status, which can be expanded through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) and provider initiated testing and counselling (PITC) models.

Numerator: 

Number of health facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services

Data Type: 
Count
Method of measurement: 
Numerator: Two possible sources of information, either: 1. Central register of all T&C sites; 2. Central test kit procurement records for the number of facilities requesting kits. If both are available, then provide the information from both. Please include data on all facilities providing services in the country, whether private, public, NGO, or other. Information on availability of certain services are usually summarized at the national or sub-national level. National TC programs should have a record of facilities that provide TC services. Effort should be made to include facilities providing services in the private and NGO sectors, especially where they are a significant provider of TC services. A recent health facility census can also provide this information as well as much more in-depth information on availability of services. All sites where TC is offered should be counted. Thus sites that offer testing and refer out samples to a lab elsewhere, get test results back, and relay results to the client, are included. All sites will be included in the numerator. Disaggregation: If possible, by: 1. Type of health facility (e.g., government health facilities, NGOs, CBOs, mission hospitals, and private health facilities) 2. Type of services offered (e.g., TB clinic, STI clinic, etc) National Representativeness: Effort should be made to include all public, private and NGO-run health facilities The numerator matters in the comparison of trends in service availability over time.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Programme records
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Sector: 
Private
Public
Strengths and weaknesses: 

This indicator is intended to monitor availability of TC services as countries continue to expand TC. It does not intend to capture quality of TC services provided.

To look at progress in the number of health facilities which provide testing and counselling. Analyzing the data geographically and by type of health facilities, and triangulating it with population data, can provide insight into where there is a need to increase availability of TC services.

It is recommended that every health facility has the capacity to offer testing and counselling in generalized epidemics. In low-level and concentrated epidemics, the goal may not be to have TC services available in every facility.

Agency: 
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Document link: 
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Testing & Counseling
Site / Setting: 
Health Care Setting
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative
Syndicate content