3 by 5, Millenium Development Goals (MDG), US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), N/A, Universal Access (UA), Additional Recommended Indicators, 2009 UN General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS)

HIV Testing in the General Population

Percentage of women and men aged 15-49 who received an HIV test in the past 12 months and know their results

ID: 
843
What it measures: 

It measures progress in implementing HIV testing and counselling.

In order to protect themselves and to prevent infecting others, it is important for individuals to know their HIV status. Knowledge of one’s status is also a critical factor in the decision to seek treatment.

Numerator: 

Number of respondents aged 15-49 who have been tested for HIV during the last 12 months and who know their results.

Denominator: 

Number of all respondents aged 15-49.
The denominator includes respondents who have never heard of HIV or AIDS.

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Population-based surveys (Demographic and Health Survey, AIDS Indicator Survey, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey or other representative survey). Respondents are asked: 1. I don't want to know the results, but have you been tested for HIV in the last 12 months? If yes: 2. I don't want to know the results, but did you get the results of that test? For further information on DHS/AIS methodology and survey instruments, visit www.measuredhs.com.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Population-based survey
Data Collection Tools: 
AIDS Indicator Survey (AIS)
Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)
Measurement Frequency: 
Every 3-5 years
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Age-group: 
15 years - 19 years
20 years - 24 years
25 years - 49 years
Gender: 
Female
Male
Strengths and weaknesses: 

The introductory statement “I don't want to know the results, but…” allows for better reporting and reduces the risk of underreporting of HIV testing among people who do not wish to disclose their serostatus.

Knowledge of HIV test results in the past 12 months does not guarantee that a respondent knows their current HIV status. A respondent may have contracted HIV in the time since their last HIV test.

Preferred Indicator: 
Global AIDS Progress Reporting 2012
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Global AIDS Progress Reporting 2012
Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting (GARPR) 2013
Universal Access (UA)
US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Prevention
Programme Focus Specific: 
Testing & Counseling
Target Population: 
Age: Adults
Age: Young People
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Percentage of newly registered TB patients who are HIV positive

Percentage of newly registered TB patients who are HIV positive

ID: 
773
What it measures: 

Surveillance of HIV prevalence among TB patients will give information about the epidemics of both TB and HIV. In particular, it indicates the degree of overlap in the epidemics in any given setting and, when compared with the HIV prevalence in the general population, indicates the contribution of HIV to the TB epidemic in any given setting.

Numerator: 

Total number of newly registered TB patients who are HIV positive over a given time period

Denominator: 

Total number of newly registered TB patients (registered over the same given time period) who were tested for HIV and included in the surveillance system

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Selecting the appropriate strategy for HIV surveillance among TB patients depends mainly on the existing surveillance system and the underlying HIV epidemic state in a country. There are three main methods for surveillance of HIV among TB patients. Routine HIV testing data can form the basis of a reliable surveillance system at all levels of HIV epidemic (low-level, concentrated and generalized), provided that high coverage is achieved (more than 80 percent of all TB patients giving consent and being tested). These routine data can be calibrated by periodic (special) or sentinel surveys. Sentinel surveillance collects information regularly and consistently from a predetermined number of people from specific sites and population groups that are of particular interest or are representative of a larger population. The difficulty with sentinel surveillance is in determining how representative the people are of the population from which they are taken and how representative they are of the general population of TB patients. Sentinel surveillance systems are usually based on unlinked anonymous testing methods, often using blood specimens that have been collected for other purposes and stripped of all identifying markers. Periodic special surveys have a specific role in which the prevalence of HIV among TB patients has not been previously estimated and are an essential part of the initial assessment of the situation. Surveys using representative sampling methods and appropriate sample sizes can provide accurate estimates of the burden of HIV among TB patients. This information may alert TB programs to a potential HIV problem and enable action to be taken that may include the implementation of more systematic surveillance. Surveillance of HIV prevalence should ideally include all newly registered TB patients, diagnosed according to international standards. However, if periodic special surveys or sentinel methods are used and resources are limited, countries may choose to include only adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB: those with a definitive diagnosis of TB. Countries with scarce resources in which the HIV epidemic state is either low or concentrated may also choose to only include a smaller subgroup of TB patients, such as adults aged 15–59 years. Relapse cases should be excluded from surveillance systems because of the risk of surveying the same patient twice, unless they are identified as such and the results are analyzed separately. However, relapse cases may be included and need not be identified as such if surveillance is based on survey methods and these surveys are undertaken over a short period of time, ideally less than 2–3 months.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
HIV sero-sentinel surveillance
Special study
Measurement Frequency: 
Annual
Indicator Type: 
Disease Impact
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
N/A
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus Specific: 
Testing & Counseling
Tuberculosis (TB)
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Patients: TB (tuberculosis)
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Number and percentage of municipalities with at least one human rights network functioning

Number and percentage of municipalities with at least one human rights network functioning

A human rights network will at least include: a human rights ombudsperson office, human rights desk or accredited legal offices that permit people living with HIV and/or population groups most at risk who
believe that their human rights or fundamental freedoms have been violated to lodge a confidential petition and to start the necessary proceedings. Depending on the current policy and legal environment

ID: 
772
What it measures: 

Stigma and related human rights violations fuel the HIV epidemic. Stigma is literally a “mark” or “blemish” on someone or something. HIV is often viewed negatively, and social attitudes may be damaging to those infected or suspected of living with HIV. Discrimination is defined more in terms of legal and human rights: when a person loses a job because of the negative connotation or impression of HIV, overt discrimination has taken place. HIV is heavily stigmatized in most societies. A strengthened
human rights–based response to the epidemic will help to increase social cohesion and the community’s ability to respond to the epidemic. Programs aim to combat active discrimination by changing laws to
support people living with HIV and by ensuring that these laws are enforced. Mechanisms need to be in place to record, document and address cases of discrimination experienced by people living with HIV
and populations most at risk. An important step is to develop networks in which violations or complaints of human rights can be reported and handled.

Numerator: 

Total number of municipalities with at least one human rights network functioning

Denominator: 

Total number of municipalities surveyed

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Tools: special survey; desk reviews Frequency: annual Disaggregation: By geographical region
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Special study
Programme review
Measurement Frequency: 
Annual
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Infrastructure
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
N/A
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Retired
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Infrastructure
Programme Focus Specific: 
Stigma & Discrimination
Human Rights
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Number and percentage of enterprises implementing an HIV workplace program

Number and percentage of enterprises implementing an HIV workplace program

ID: 
771
What it measures: 

The workplace is a strategic venue for promoting HIV prevention within a country’s population. It is in employers’ best interest to maintain a healthy workforce, and encouraging their participation helps bring about normative practices within the world of work. This indicator permits monitoring the number of enterprises that are implementing some aspect of a workplace HIV program that addresses the prevention of HIV within the workforce.

Numerator: 

Number of enterprises that are implementing an HIV workplace program

Denominator: 

Total number of enterprises surveyed

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Tools: special survey Frequency: annual Countries with partners funded by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief that are working in workplace prevention should collect data continuously at the facility or community level (program monitoring tools). In this case, the denominator would be the sum of all enterprises that have received support from the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief for workplace programs. Enterprises are defined as public or private, formal or informal, workplace entities made up of management and workers. Access is defined as making the service available to employees for free or at low cost either on site or outside the enterprise through a formal referral system. When the service is made available outside the enterprise through a referral system, the enterprise must have an agreement with a local provider to provide the service via a workplace referral. Comprehensive HIV workplace programs have many components. This indicator focuses on the following four critical areas: -HIV workplace policy; -HIV peer education program; -voluntary HIV counseling and testing (either on site or via referral); and -formal activities to prevent HIV transmission.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Special study
Measurement Frequency: 
Annual
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Policy
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
N/A
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Retired
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Human Resources
Site / Setting: 
Workplace
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Number and percentage of adults and children newly enrolled in HIV care who start on treatment for latent TB infection (isoniazid preventive therapy) among the total number of adults and children newly enrolled in HIV care over a given time period

Number and percentage of adults and children newly enrolled in HIV care who start on treatment for latent TB infection (isoniazid preventive therapy) among the total number of adults and children newly enrolled in HIV care over a given time period

Alias: 
WHO: Percentage of adults and children newly enrolled in HIV care starting isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT)
ID: 
770
What it measures: 

Number of adults and children newly-enrolled in HIV care who started on treatment for latent TB infection (TB preventive therapy (TBPT), isoniazid preventative therapy(IPT)) expressed as a proportion of the total number of adults and children newly-enrolled in HIV care over a given time period.

To ensure that eligible people living with HIV are given treatment for latent TB infection and thus to reduce the incidence of TB among people living with HIV.

Numerator: 

Number of adults and children newly enrolled (i.e. started) in HIV care (pre-ART and ART) who also start (i.e. given at least one dose) isoniazid preventive therapy treatment during the reporting period
HIV care includes pre-ART and ART.

Denominator: 

Number of adults and children newly enrolled (i.e. started) in HIV care during the reporting period.

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
The data needed for this indicator are collected from pre–antiretroviral therapy and antiretroviral therapy registers at the HIV care service sites, depending on where TB preventive therapy is to be administered. People living with HIV should have their TB status assessed. Those found not to have evidence of active TB will be offered TB preventive therapy according to nationally determined guidelines. All those accepting TB preventive therapy and receiving at least the first dose of treatment should be recorded. This information is being recorded in an extra column in the HIV care registers. Accurately predicting drug requirements for supply management requires the collection of more detailed information. This information is being recorded through an extra column in the HIV care register and on the patient treatment card. Accurately predicting drug requirements for supply management requires collecting more detailed information: a pharmacy-based TB preventive therapy (isoniazid) register should record client attendance to collect further drug supplies (usually monthly). From this register, facilities would be able to report the number of new cases, continuing cases and completed cases on a quarterly basis. If such information is collected routinely, the indicator of choice would be the number of HIV-positive clients completing treatment of latent TB infection as a proportion of the total number of HIV-positive clients started on such treatment. Pilot testing sites show that 10–50 percent of clients who test HIV-positive can be expected to start TB preventive therapy; some will not meet the eligibility criteria, some will decline to participate and some will drop out during the screening process. The proportion likely to start TB preventive therapy depends on the screening algorithm used (for example, using tuberculin skin test as a screening tool reduces the number that are eligible) and on the type of facility at which HIV diagnosis is made. Among hospital or clinical referrals, a greater proportion would be expected to be sick and thus ineligible for treatment of latent TB infection. Higher proportions would be expected from sites linked to preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV or stand-alone voluntary counseling and testing centers. Most programs would aim to exceed 60 percent starting isoniazid preventive therapy depending on the types of HIV testing and counseling facilities available. Tool: pre–antiretroviral therapy registers. The data are collated on the cross-sectional quarterly reporting formats and reported to the national level. Ideally, all new clients should be registered by HIV care (pre–antiretroviral therapy) registers. In the situations in which new clients are enrolled directly onto antiretroviral therapy registers, these need to be included. Frequency: collected continuously and reported and analyzed quarterly WHO/UA: HIV treatment card and modified HIV care register. The data needed for this indicator is collected from pre ART and ART registers at the HIV care service sites, depending on where TB preventive therapy (TBPT) is to be administered. HIV-positive clients should be screened for TB. Those clients found not to have evidence of active TB will be offered TBPT according to nationally determined guidelines. All those accepting TBPT and receiving at least the first dose of treatment should be recorded. This information is being recorded in an extra column in the HIV care registers. Accurately predicting drug requirements for supply management requires the collection of more detailed information. Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool • Please provide any comments on whether the data you provide covers the entire country, or is from a selected sample (if so, please provide details on what the data represents, as well as any assumptions made to extrapolate the data to a national figure).
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Patient record
Programme records
Measurement Frequency: 
Continuously
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

Treatment of latent TB infection will reduce the incidence of developing TB disease in People living with HIV who are infected with TB but who have no active TB disease. To include clients who are given at least one dose is relatively easy, even in resource- limited settings. This information is the minimum necessary to ensure that TB preventive therapy is being offered to HIV-positive clients without evidence of active TB. However, unless further data are collected, this indicator provides no information about how many clients adhere to or complete the TB preventive therapy course. Much greater resources are required to collect more complete data on adherence or completion, but programmes may wish to undertake periodic studies to establish, for example, adherence rates, and the accuracy of the screening questionnaire.

Additional considerations:
A pharmacy based TB preventive therapy (INH) register should record client attendance to collect further drug supplies (usually monthly). From this register, facilities would be able to report the number of new, and continuing cases and treatment completion on a quarterly basis. If such information is collected routinely, the indicator of choice would be 'the number of HIV-positive clients completing treatment of latent TB infection, as a proportion of the total number of HIV-positive clients started on such treatment".
From pilot testing sites it is apparent that 10–50% of clients who test HIV-positive can be expected to start TB preventive therapy; some will not meet the eligibility criteria, some will decline and some will drop out during the screening process. The proportion likely to start TB preventive therapy depends on the screening algorithm used (for example, using tuberculin skin test as a screening tool reduces the number that are eligible) and also on the type of facility at which HIV diagnosis is made.
Among hospital or clinical referrals, more sick patients would be ineligible for treatment of latent TB infection. Higher proportions would be expected from sites linked to PMTCT or stand-alone VCT centres. Most programmes would aim for at least 50% of people newly enrolled in HIV care starting IPT during the year.

Data utilization: If low value, explore reasons why and compare disaggregated data with the national average to identify places needing special attention and reasons for suboptimal coverage. Explore further available data on completion of TBPT/IPT.

Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Prevention
Programme Focus Specific: 
Tuberculosis (TB)
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
People Living with HIV
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Number and percentage of adults and children enrolled in HIV care who had TB status assessed and recorded during their last visit among all adults and children enrolled in HIV care in the reporting period

Number and percentage of adults and children enrolled in HIV care who had TB status assessed and recorded during their last visit among all adults and children enrolled in HIV care in the reporting period

Alias: 
WHO: Percentage of adults and children enrolled in HIV care who had TB status assessed and recorded during their last visit
ID: 
768
What it measures: 

GFATM: This indicator assesses activity intended to reduce the impact of TB among people living with HIV. It demonstrates the level of implementation of the recommendation that people living with HIV be screened for TB at diagnosis and at all follow-up visits.

WHO: Number of adults and children enrolled in HIV care who had TB status assessed and recorded during their last visit.

This is a process indicator for an activity intended to reduce the impact of TB among people living with HIV. It will demonstrate the level of implementation of the recommendation that people living with HIV are screened for TB at diagnosis and at follow-up visits using their last visit as proxy measure.

Numerator: 

Number of adults and children in HIV care, who had their TB status assessed and recorded during their last visit.
HIV care includes pre-ART and ART.

Denominator: 

Total number of adults and children enrolled in HIV carea in the reporting period

Data Type: 
Percent
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
GFATM: Data should be recorded routinely at every visit on the person’s HIV care or antiretroviral therapy card and transferred onto the pre–antiretroviral therapy and antiretroviral therapy registers at all facilities providing routine HIV care. These data should be analyzed quarterly and reported on the quarterly cross- sectional reports to the national level. TB and HIV programs should collaborate to ensure that agreed criteria for identifying a person suspected of having TB and that the methods of TB screening used are consistent with TB control program protocols. A suggested method of conducting the screening would be to ask clients living with HIV whether they are currently receiving TB treatment. If not, they are then asked about the key symptoms of TB disease (such as cough lasting more than two weeks, persistent fever, night sweats, unexplained weight loss and lymphadenopathy). A simple checklist could be used, and any positive response would indicate that the individual may be suspected of having TB. If, on questioning, they are defined as suspected of having TB (in accordance with national protocols), treatment for latent TB infection should not be given and they should be investigated for TB (or referred to a TB service for investigation) and treated appropriately. Those found not to have TB should be offered six months of isoniazid preventive therapy. Tools: HIV care and antiretroviral therapy patient cards with data transferred to the pre–antiretroviral therapy and antiretroviral therapy registers and then quarterly reporting formats Frequency: data should be collected continuously and reported as part of the quarterly cross-sectional reports and analyzed quarterly or at least annually; these data could be cross-checked using card sorts during annual patient monitoring reviews WHO: WHO recommends the use of a simplified screening algorithm for intensified TB case findings that includes 4 clinical symptoms: (1) current cough, (2) fever, (3) weight loss and (4) night sweats. Using this simplified algorithm assessment of TB status at every visit during the reporting period (‘Yes’ if ‘no signs’, ‘suspect’ or ‘on treatment’ and ‘No’ if TB status not assessed) should be recorded on the patient HIV care/ART card, and transferred onto the pre-ART or ART registers as appropriate at all facilities providing routine HIV care. Enrolled in care includes all those continuing in care and those newly enrolled during the reporting period This data should be analysed and reported together with other cross sectional data at national level. The numerator is taken from the pre ART and ART registers by counting the number of patients who had their TB status assessed during the reporting period. For patients who started on ART during the reporting period, care should be taken to count them in the ART register and not in the pre-ART register. The denominator for pre-ART patients will be those seen for care during the reporting period. The denominator for ART patients will be those current on ART during the reporting period. The denominator is taken from the pre-ART and ART registers by counting the number of patients with a visit during the reporting period. This is then recorded on the cross sectional reporting form. TB and HIV programmes should collaborate to ensure that agreed criteria for identifying a TB suspect and methods of TB screening are used that are consistent with TB control programme protocols. Data Quality Control and Notes for the Reporting Tool • Please provide any comments on how this data was collected and any assumptions made in establishing a national estimate.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Patient record
Programme records
Measurement Frequency: 
Continuously
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Strengths and weaknesses: 

TB status assessment among people living with HIV, followed by prompt referral for diagnosis and treatment, increases the chances of survival, improves quality of life and reduces transmission of TB in the community. TB status assessment identifies HIV-positive clients who show no evidence of active TB and would benefit from treatment with isoniazid for latent TB infection. The indicator does not measure the quality of intensified TB case-finding nor does it reveal whether those identified as suspects are investigated further or effectively for TB. However, it does emphasize the importance of intensified TB case-finding for people living with HIV at diagnosis and at every contact they have with HIV treatment and care services. Programmes should aim for a high value for this indicator (close to 100%) but should interpret it in conjunction with values of indicators related to the % of people in HIV care who are: a) on TB treatment and b) who were given treatment for latent TB infection, to ensure that appropriate action follows the screening process. A low value will demonstrate that Objective B - reducing the impact of TB among people living with HIV - is unlikely to be met.

Data utilization: See section on Strengths and Weaknesses for interpretation of data and further areas to explore. If low value, review disaggregated data and explore reasons why.

Other References: HIV/TB M&E Guide #B.1.1.1

Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Relevance: 
Universal Access (UA)
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Prevention
Programme Focus Specific: 
Tuberculosis (TB)
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Sex: All
People Living with HIV
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
Initiative

Percentage of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years who report improvement in their emotional well-being

Percentage of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years who report improvement in their
emotional well-being

For the purposes of this indicator, an orphan is defined as a child younger than 18 years who has lost
both parents. A child made vulnerable by HIV is younger than 18 years and fulfills any of the following:
-has lost one or both parents;
-has a chronically ill parent (regardless of whether the parent lives in the same household as the child);

ID: 
767
What it measures: 

This indicator is intended to measure psychosocial well-being among orphaned and most vulnerable
children, beyond material satisfaction.

Numerator: 

Number of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years reporting at least five elements
of the psychosocial well-being matrix at the time of the survey

Denominator: 

Total number of orphans and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
After all orphans and vulnerable children aged 0–17 years in the household have been identified, those aged 5–17 years are asked questions related to their psychosocial well-being such as discrimination and freedom of expression in the household or community. Countries need to design these questions according to their local context. Tools: population-based surveys (Demographic Health Survey, AIDS Indicator Survey, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey or other representative surveys) Frequency: every 2–5 years For children, protocols that are more ethical are needed and some countries do not allow children to be interviewed. These issues have to be considered while designing the studies to measure this indicator.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Population-based survey
Data Collection Tools: 
AIDS Indicator Survey (AIS)
Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)
Measurement Frequency: 
Every 2-4 years
Epidemic Type: 
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Behavioral Outcome
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
N/A
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Retired
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Care & Support
Target Population: 
Age: Children
Age: Young People
Orphans & Vulnerable Children
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Percentage of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years who have three basic material needs met

Percentage of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years who have three basic material needs
met

For the purposes of this indicator, an orphan is defined as a child younger than 18 years who has lost
both parents. A child made vulnerable by HIV is younger than 18 years and fulfills any of the following:
-has lost one or both parents;
-has a chronically ill parent (regardless of whether the parent lives in the same household as the child);

ID: 
766
What it measures: 

The indicator is intended to measure progress towards meeting the material needs of orphans and
vulnerable children and improved the quality of their care as a result of various interventions targeted at
improving the livelihood conditions of orphans and vulnerable children and their households.

Numerator: 

Number of orphaned and other most vulnerable children aged 5–17 years reporting having at
least three basic needs met

Denominator: 

Total number of orphaned and vulnerable children aged 5–17 years

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
After all orphans and vulnerable children aged 0–17 years in the household have been identified, those aged 5–17 years are asked questions related to provision of their basic needs such as food, shelter, clothing, education and health services. Specific questions will be formulated according to country setting. External support is defined as help free of charge coming from a source other than friends, family or neighbors unless they are working for a community-based group or organization. Tools: population-based surveys (Demographic Health Survey, AIDS Indicator Survey, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey or other representative surveys) Frequency: every 2–5 years For children, more ethical protocols are needed and some countries do not allow children to be interviewed. These issues have to be considered while designing the studies to measure this indicator.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Population-based survey
Data Collection Tools: 
AIDS Indicator Survey (AIS)
Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)
Measurement Frequency: 
Every 2-4 years
Epidemic Type: 
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
N/A
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Retired
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Care & Support
Target Population: 
Age: Children
Age: Young People
Orphans & Vulnerable Children
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Number of adults and children living with HIV who receive care and support services outside facilities during the reporting period

Number of adults and children living with HIV who receive care and support services outside facilities
during the reporting period

ID: 
765
What it measures: 

Adults and children living with HIV should receive a comprehensive package of services (see below) to
improve the quality of life, extend life and delay the need for antiretroviral therapy. Care and support
programs can cover external support, including counseling, health care, help with household work,
companionship, financial support, legal services and access to shelter or other social services. The
goal should be to provide services in different domains and to provide these services using a holistic
approach, from the time of HIV diagnosis. Many of these services are provided outside the formal health
care system and take place at the household level and some at the community level. This indicator tracks information on the level of coverage and care and support provided outside facilities (at the household and community levels) to people living with HIV.

Numerator: 

Number of adults and children living with HIV who received at least one service from the
essential package (regardless of the number of service provision episodes) outside a health facility during
the reporting period

Denominator: 

Not applicable

Data Type: 
Count
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Not applicable
Method of measurement: 
To ensure quality care, all people living with HIV should receive health care support for their illness regardless of whether that support takes place within a facility or outside of a facility. There may be country-specific approaches to grouping services into the major care and support categories. However, to be counted in this numerator, a person living with HIV must receive at least one service from the essential package of services, and that service must take place outside a health facility. For the purposes of reporting on this indicator, “outside a facility” may refer to community gatherings, mobile units or home-based care settings. Services provided in primary, secondary or tertiary health facilities or hospitals should not be counted here.c An essential package of services for people living with HIV is recommended to include: -health care and home-based care, such as counseling on and monitoring of adherence to antiretroviral therapy; pain management; and referral of people suspected of having TB; -spiritual and psychosocial support, such as participation in self-help groups and peer counseling related to hopes, fears, meaning, guilt, etc.; mental health; succession planning; and preparing for and coping with the process of dying; -socioeconomic support, such as nutritional support; social and health insurance; social patronage; and financial support; -legal and human rights, such as legal aid; protection against violence and discrimination; stigma; and child protection services; and - integrated disease prevention services with care, such as HIV risk reduction messaging and counseling. Disaggregation: sex, age, service provider and location depending on the country-specific needs Data can be obtained from all HIV care and support service providers in the country or region. These might include: -individual nongovernmental organizations; -individual private organizations; and -individual public (government) organizations, such as social services within the relevant ministries. Frequency: Quarterly Data are aggregated at the central level on a regular basis. A single body (usually the national M&E unit) should be responsible for data aggregation, analysis and dissemination. Double counting (such as people receiving services from different providers) needs to be avoided.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Programme records
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
Female
Male
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Care & Support
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A

Number and percentage of adults and children enrolled in HIV carea and eligible for co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (according to national guidelines) currently receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis

Number and percentage of adults and children enrolled in HIV carea and eligible for co-trimoxazole
prophylaxis (according to national guidelines) currently receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis

ID: 
764
What it measures: 

Co-trimoxazole prophylaxis is a simple and cost-effective intervention that reduces the risk of
opportunistic infections and mortality among children and adults living with HIV. WHO recommends
administration of co-trimoxazole for the following groups: adults living with HIV, including pregnant
women, children living with HIV and infants exposed to HIV.b The WHO guidelines offer countries a
choice of whether to provide co-trimoxazole broadly or according to disease stage.

Numerator: 

Number of adults and children living with HIV enrolled in HIV carea and receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis

Denominator: 

A. Number of adults and children living with HIV enrolled in HIV care who are eligible for
co-trimoxazole prophylaxis based on national guidelines. B. Estimated number of people living with HIV
in the country

Data Type: 
Percent
Unit: 
N/A
Multiplier: 
N/A
Composite Indicator: 
No
Calculation: 
Numerator / Denominator
Method of measurement: 
Numerator: Individuals should be considered to be “receiving” co-trimoxazole prophylaxis if co- trimoxazole has been prescribed and obtained by the patient (provided by a program or procured by the patient). Include “active” patients: ones seen at the clinic at least once in the past year. Do not include HIV-exposed infants who have not yet been confirmed as HIV positive and are therefore not enrolled in HIV care. The indicator is not meant to account for short-term lapses in adherence or short-term stock- outs. If individuals are served by more than one program that might provide co-trimoxazole prophylaxis, the figure should be adjusted as needed so that the numerator represents only unique individuals receiving co-trimoxazole within the reporting period. Countries should focus on compiling data for the numerator from patient registers at facilities. Where patient level data are not available, countries may develop program or facility-level estimates of coverage with co-trimoxazole and apply these estimates to the total number of individuals receiving care and support services through those programs or facilities. People living with HIV receiving co-trimoxazole in both the private sector and the public sector should be included in the numerator where data for both are available. Denominator: (A) Number of people living with HIV eligible for co-trimoxazole according to national guidelines. This denominator will be derived through estimations based on country guidelines for co- trimoxazole (where guidelines exist). The proportion derived from using this denominator will provide data on the coverage of co-trimoxazole among people living with HIV eligible to receive co-trimoxazole. (B) Estimated number of people living with HIV in the country. The denominator is an estimation of the number of people living with HIV produced through the SPECTRUM model, which is based on surveillance data from facilities and calibrated as new population-based survey data become available. The proportion derived from using this denominator will provide country coverage data of co- trimoxazole among people living with HIV. Disaggregation: By sex and age Age represents an individual’s age at the end of the reporting period or when last seen at the facility.
Data Collection
Data Collection Method: 
Estimate
Programme records
Measurement Frequency: 
Continuously
Epidemic Type: 
Concentrated/low level
Generalized
Indicator Type: 
Programme / Service Delivery
Indicator Level: 
National
Disaggregations
Education: 
N/A
Gender: 
Female
Male
Geographic Location: 
N/A
Pregnancy: 
N/A
Sector: 
N/A
Target: 
N/A
Time Period: 
N/A
Type of Orphan: 
N/A
Vulnerability Status: 
N/A
HIV Status: 
N/A
Service Type: 
N/A
Type/Timing of Testing: 
N/A
Condom Type: 
N/A
Preferred Indicator: 
TBD
Agency: 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Relevance: 
N/A
Status: 
Active
Keywords
Programme Focus General: 
Care & Support
Programme Focus Specific: 
Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis
Target Population: 
Age: Not Specified
Sex: All
Goal - Initiative or Country: 
N/A
Syndicate content